Logic models, theories of action, or theories of change, are valuable means for articulating, understanding, and planning science learning programs. They are often required by funders, but they are incredibly useful for program developers and implementers as well. As a stand-alone process or as part of a full-scale evaluation, we work closely with you to articulate the underlying program theory, whether it be for action or for change, by visually representing the inherent linkages of program inputs, outputs, and outcomes in the short, medium, or long term.

Empirical Studies range from single case studies with qualitative and textual data to randomized-control trials with very quantifiable data. Although empirical studies are the cornerstone of much of our evaluation work, our guiding principle is that the type of study, the design of the study, the analysis tools, and the outcomes of interest all must be aligned to the context of the program the needs of stakeholders and constituents, and, most importantly, with equity and justice forwarded. We have expertise in a range of empirical approaches and can work with you to develop and implement a human-centered, equitable, racially and socially just empirical study.

We are experts in instrument development: from short surveys to complex observations tools. We are part of the Activation Lab, which has a suite of tools available to help evaluate and understand the impact of your science learning program. Let us help create tools tailored to your program and context.

As more and more evaluations are conducted internally, by participants themselves, the need for external review panels, that bring expertise and unique perspectives and understanding to the work itself, has increased. We can arrange and convene review panels, by connecting our network of experts, your communities, and social justice specialists to review evaluation plans, data, and reports.

Reporting out is critical to evaluation work – stakeholders, constituents, funders, participants, and program staff all should contribute to and hear about the results of evaluation work. Our reporting techniques are appropriate for each circumstance and include both text-based, webinar or virtual presentations, and, increasingly, web-based reports. In addition, we can develop specific reports (literature review, technical reports) for you that can help guide the development of programs or indeed of evaluations themselves.